交锁髓内钉与加压钢板治疗胫骨中远段骨折疗效比较(1)
 |
| 第1页 |
参见附件。
[摘要] 目的 比较交锁髓内钉与加压钢板治疗胫骨中远段骨折的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析在我院进行治疗的胫骨中远段骨折患者60例的临床资料。其中30例患者采用交锁髓内钉内固定治疗，30例患者采用加压钢板内固定治疗。比较两组临床疗效。 结果 髓内钉组优良率显著优于钢板内固定组(P<0.05)。髓内钉组骨痂出现时间和愈合时间显著早于钢板组(P<0.01)。结论 交锁髓内钉与加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨中远段骨折临床疗效比较，具有愈合早、骨折愈合优良率高等优点。
[关键词] 交锁髓内钉；加压钢板；胫骨骨折
[中图分类号] R687.3 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2014)10-178-03
[Abstract] Objective To compare clinical efficacy between interlocking intramedullary nail and dynamic compressive plate for treatment of fracture of tibia. Methods Clinical data of 60 cases with fracture of tibia were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty cases were treated by interlocking intramedullary nail， and thirty cases were treated by dynamic compressive plate. Clinical efficacy were compared between two groups ......
您现在查看是摘要介绍页，详见PDF附件。